tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8925011239177942231.post7055018601508560045..comments2024-03-04T10:47:31.894-08:00Comments on The Textual Mechanic: Cicero and the Elder Pliny on the Papyrus BookrollTimothy N. Mitchellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10696299768205488795noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8925011239177942231.post-28235337981130287192015-11-29T13:54:56.298-08:002015-11-29T13:54:56.298-08:00I would not take anything too seriously from that ...I would not take anything too seriously from that source. Note that the primary source that the author references is from 1881! There is quite a bit of current readership. One must also consider that no-one is suppressing any "truth" about the differences in the manuscripts of the Bible. The full scanned in pages of both manuscripts mentioned are freely available online at www.codexsinaiticus.org and http://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.gr.1209Timothy N. Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10696299768205488795noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8925011239177942231.post-30424508685726795532015-11-26T14:58:57.252-08:002015-11-26T14:58:57.252-08:00Just wondering what do you think about this articl...Just wondering what do you think about this article<br />http://www.vatileaks.com/vati-leaks/why_does_god_keep_changing_his_word<br />Doesnt the differences between the codex vaticanus and sinaiticus prove that the bible isnt reliable?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01785710814340316883noreply@blogger.com